National parks, wildlife sanctuaries and biosphere reserves

CGPSC - SSE Paper 1 — Geography

Last updated 12 Jun 2026

44 min read8,741 words
Topper-Trusted Notes
3
PYQs Analyzed
2019–2022
Years Covered
Paper 1
CGPSC - SSE
Built fromOfficial Syllabus+PYQ Deep-Dive+Topper Strategy

Study notes content is available at PSCPrep.ai

National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries and Biosphere Reserves — Chhattisgarh

Introduction

Chhattisgarh is among the most ecologically rich states in India, carved out of Madhya Pradesh in November 2000 with a forest cover that at the time of its formation exceeded 44 per cent of its total geographical area. That forested identity is not incidental — it is constitutive of the state's geography, tribal culture, and administrative challenges. The state straddles the watersheds of the Mahanadi, Indravati, Shivnath, and Hasdeo river systems; its terrain ranges from the Chhattisgarh Plain in the north-centre through the Bastar Plateau and Kanger Valley in the south to the Surguja uplands and Sarguja forests in the north. Within this landscape, a network of protected areas — national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, biosphere reserves, and conservation reserves — has been developed over the decades to safeguard biodiversity that rivals that of several entire countries.

For aspirants preparing for the CGPSC State Service Examination, this subtopic is simultaneously one of the most rewarding and the most treacherous. It is rewarding because the facts are largely finite and learnable: there are exactly three national parks, a defined set of wildlife sanctuaries, one biosphere reserve, and a handful of conservation reserves in Chhattisgarh. It is treacherous because question-setters regularly exploit confusion between the three legal categories, test knowledge of precise district locations, probe the boundaries and water features associated with specific parks, and mix in details about waterfalls, rivers, and tribal heritage that spill over into adjacent geography topics. This subtopic has appeared three times across the years covered by the PYQ dataset — in 2019, 2020, and 2022 — which classifies it as a high-frequency topic warranting thorough preparation.

The 2019 question tested district-level location of a wildlife sanctuary; the 2020 question tested the dual status (national park and biosphere reserve) of a landmark site and probed its geographical extent; the 2022 question tested knowledge of specific waterfalls within a valley. All three questions required precise factual recall rather than conceptual reasoning alone. This pattern tells a clear story: the examiner is interested in whether candidates have actually studied the map of Chhattisgarh's protected areas, not merely whether they understand what "national park" means in the abstract.

The broader syllabus context is also important. The official CGPSC syllabus lists this subtopic alongside physiography, rivers, climate, forests, districts, and archaeological centres. That placement is deliberate — protected areas are anchored in the physical geography of the state, and candidates who understand the river-valley geography of Chhattisgarh will find it far easier to remember where each sanctuary sits. The Kanger Valley National Park lies in the Kanger Valley carved by the Kanger River, a tributary of the Indravati; Indravati National Park wraps around the upper Indravati basin in Bijapur; Guru Ghasidas National Park sits in the Sarguja-Koriya highland at the boundary with Jharkhand. Each protected area is anchored in geography.

This chapter builds knowledge from first principles — defining the legal categories, explaining what distinguishes them, and then treating each of Chhattisgarh's major protected areas in depth. It includes worked walkthroughs of the actual PYQs, a map of likely future questions, common traps that derail candidates, and revision tools to consolidate memory. It is designed so that a candidate who has not previously studied this topic can, after reading it carefully, attempt any question the CGPSC has ever set on protected areas — and be well-prepared for whatever the examiner invents next.

The ecological foundation of Chhattisgarh's protected area network rests on three distinct landscape zones. The northern highlands (Sarguja, Koriya, Balrampur, Jashpur) form a plateau of mixed deciduous forest that merges into the Jharkhand-Chhota Nagpur landscape to the east and the Vindhya-Satpura ranges to the west. The central plains (Raipur, Durg, Mahasamund, Rajnandgaon) are predominantly agricultural with fragmented forest patches and smaller sanctuaries. The southern Bastar plateau (Bastar/Jagdalpur, Bijapur, Kanker, Kondagaon, Narayanpur) is one of the last great forest wildernesses of peninsular India — connected to the Eastern Ghats on the east and the Deccan plateau forests on the south and west. The Kanger Valley and Indravati national parks both sit in this southern landscape; their protection is inseparable from the fate of the Bastar forests.

Understanding which landscape zone a protected area sits in also helps candidates recall its ecology, its threats, and its associated rivers — all of which feed into the type of multi-statement questions that CGPSC favours. A candidate who knows that Indravati NP sits in the southern Bastar belt, near the Indravati River, in a region with significant Left-Wing Extremism-related governance challenges, will find many factual questions about that park easier to anchor.

The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (Forest Rights Act, FRA) adds another layer of complexity to Chhattisgarh's protected area story. Chhattisgarh has one of the highest proportions of scheduled tribe population in India (approximately 32% per Census 2011), and many tribal communities live within or adjacent to national parks and sanctuaries. The FRA created individual and community forest rights that in some cases conflict with wildlife protection mandates. The resolution of these conflicts — through the identification of Critical Wildlife Habitats — is an ongoing process across all three national parks. This governance challenge is distinct from, but related to, the Naxal-related difficulties in the Bastar belt that affect Indravati National Park.


Core Concepts & Foundations

Before cataloguing specific sites, every serious aspirant must have complete command over the legal architecture governing wildlife protection in India. Without this, even memorising the correct facts can lead to wrong answers, because examiners frequently test the nuances of classification.

Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (WPA): The central statute of India governing the protection of wild animals and plants. It establishes the legal definitions of and procedures for creating protected areas — including wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, conservation reserves, and community reserves — and prescribes the penalties for poaching, trade, and habitat destruction. Every protected area in Chhattisgarh draws its legal existence from this Act.

National Park: A protected area notified under Section 35 of the WPA in which no human activity — grazing, forestry, collection of minor forest produce, or residence — is permissible except with the prior approval of the Chief Wildlife Warden and the State Government. Once the final notification is issued, the boundaries of a national park cannot be altered except by an Act of the State Legislature. National parks represent the strictest protection category.

Wildlife Sanctuary: A protected area notified under Section 26A of the WPA. Sanctuaries permit a wider range of human activities than national parks, including the collection of certain forest produce and, in some cases, regulated grazing and habitation of communities present at the time of declaration. The boundary of a sanctuary can be altered by order of the State Government without an Act of the Legislature, making it a more flexible (and hence somewhat weaker) form of protection.

Biosphere Reserve: A category established not under the WPA but under UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. Biosphere reserves are designated by the Central Government of India (not state governments) on the recommendation of the National Biosphere Reserve Committee. They are organised into three nested zones: a strictly protected Core Zone (equivalent to a national park or sanctuary), a Buffer Zone in which research and education are encouraged but impacts are minimised, and a Transition Zone (also called the cooperation zone) in which sustainable human use is permitted. A biosphere reserve thus encompasses more land than the underlying national park or sanctuary at its core.

Conservation Reserve: A category introduced under the WPA via the 2002 amendment. Notified around areas that are not private land and that connect, buffer, or encompass protected areas. The management of a conservation reserve involves a Conservation Reserve Management Committee that includes local communities, giving this category a participatory character.

Tiger Reserve: A designation under Project Tiger (launched 1973), administered by the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA). Tiger reserves are not a separate legal category under the WPA — they are national parks or sanctuaries that also hold Tiger Reserve designation for the purposes of receiving central funding, scientific monitoring, and stricter enforcement. A tiger reserve typically consists of a Core/Critical Tiger Habitat (usually the national park) and a buffer zone (often extending into adjacent sanctuary or reserve forest).

Elephant Reserve: A designation under Project Elephant (launched 1992). Similar in structure to tiger reserves but for elephant habitats and corridors.

Critical Wildlife Habitat: Defined by the Forest Rights Act, 2006 as areas of national parks and sanctuaries where it has been determined that the continuation of forest rights is incompatible with the conservation objectives. The term is used in the context of resolving conflicts between tribal rights and conservation mandates.

Understanding the hierarchy matters for the 2020-type question where Kanger Ghati's dual status was tested. The key insight is that a site can hold multiple designations simultaneously:

A biosphere reserve is an umbrella designation that wraps around one or more protected areas. The core of the Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, for instance, includes the Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary as its core zone. The sanctuary itself remains a sanctuary legally; the biosphere reserve designation is an additional, overlapping classification that expands the protected geography and adds an international recognition layer.

Similarly, a tiger reserve wraps around a national park (core) and a buffer zone. Indravati Tiger Reserve in Chhattisgarh consists of Indravati National Park as its core and surrounding reserve forests as buffer.

This layering means a single site can legitimately be described simultaneously as a national park, a tiger reserve, and part of a biosphere reserve depending on which layer of governance one is referencing.

IUCN Protected Area Categories: The International Union for Conservation of Nature maintains its own classification system (Categories I–VI) that is distinct from Indian legal categories but is mentioned in some reference texts. Indian national parks broadly correspond to IUCN Category II, while sanctuaries overlap with Categories III–IV. Biosphere reserves span multiple IUCN categories across their zones. CGPSC questions rarely invoke IUCN directly, but awareness of this system prevents confusion when studying international references.

Protected Area Network (PAN): The collective system of all categories of protected areas in India that are meant to form a connected network of habitats, corridors, and ecological patches — ensuring that wildlife populations are not permanently isolated in islands of forest surrounded by human land use. Chhattisgarh's protected area network is particularly significant because the state occupies the interior of the Indian landmass and its forests serve as the connective tissue between the Western Ghats, Eastern Ghats, Vindhya-Satpura, and Chhota Nagpur landscape complexes.

Wildlife Corridor: An unprotected or partially protected strip of land linking two or more protected areas, allowing animals to move between them for food, mating, and seasonal migration. The Hasdeo-Arand forest, Kanha-Pench corridor (partly through CG), and the Indravati-Pench corridor are examples of corridors critical to Chhattisgarh's wider biodiversity. Corridors are often the first land to be lost to development and are increasingly protected through conservation reserves.

Procedure for Declaring a National Park

The process for establishing a national park under the WPA involves several steps: the State Government issues a preliminary notification specifying the area proposed; this is followed by a period during which any person with rights in the area may submit claims; claims are adjudicated by a Collector; once all rights are settled (by extinguishment or payment), a final notification is issued constituting the national park. After final notification, the boundary of a national park can only be altered by an Act of the State Legislature — this is the crucial distinction from a sanctuary, where the boundary can be changed by executive order. This procedural rigidity is why some protected areas in Chhattisgarh have remained at the "sanctuary" level rather than being upgraded to national parks despite having comparable biodiversity — the stakeholder rights-settlement process is politically and administratively demanding.

Significance of Protected Areas for CGPSC Paper 1

The CGPSC Paper 1 General Studies syllabus explicitly includes protected areas alongside rivers, physiography, forests, and demographic data. The consistent testing of this subtopic reflects several policy priorities of the Chhattisgarh government: wildlife tourism development (which generates revenue and employment in otherwise marginalised tribal districts), the management of human-wildlife conflict (particularly elephant depredation, which is an acute problem in Raigarh, Surguja, and Jashpur districts), and the state's obligations under centrally-sponsored conservation schemes. Candidates who appreciate this policy context will find it easier to reason about questions even when they cannot recall a specific fact.

Overview Comparison: National Parks vs Wildlife Sanctuaries vs Biosphere Reserves

FeatureNational ParkWildlife SanctuaryBiosphere Reserve
Governing statuteWPA 1972, Section 35WPA 1972, Section 26AUNESCO MAB Programme / GoI notification
Notifying authorityState GovernmentState GovernmentCentral Government
Boundary alterationOnly by State Legislature ActBy State Government orderDepends on core PA
Human activityStrictly prohibitedRegulated / limitedPermitted in Transition Zone
SizeTypically smallerVariableMuch larger (includes buffer)
No. in Chhattisgarh3~111 (Achanakmar-Amarkantak)
Overlap possibleYes (can be core of BR)Yes (can be core of BR)Yes (overlaps both)

National Parks of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh has three national parks. Their locations, dimensions, flagship species, associated rivers, and legal history are all fair game for examination.

Kanger Valley National Park

Kanger Valley National Park is the most frequently tested protected area in Chhattisgarh across all competitive examinations, and for good reason: it is one of the most biodiverse, scenically dramatic, and geologically fascinating sites in peninsular India.

Location and Jurisdiction. The park lies entirely within Bastar district (the undivided Bastar, now formally in Jagdalpur administrative region). After the reorganisation of Chhattisgarh's districts, Kanger Valley falls within the administrative jurisdiction of Jagdalpur as the primary nearby city. The park encompasses the Kanger Valley, carved by the Kanger River (also spelled Kanker River in some sources, but the park and valley are named Kanger), a tributary of the Indravati River.

Area and Notified Status. The park covers approximately 200 sq km and was notified as a national park. It is also a biosphere reserve — specifically, it is both a national park and has been recognised as a biosphere reserve under the national system. This dual status is exactly what the 2020 PYQ tested: the question asked candidates to evaluate three statements about Kanger Ghati, one of which asserted it was a national park, another that it was not a biosphere reserve, and a third about its geographical extent.

Geographical Extent. The park stretches from the Tirathgarh Waterfalls in the west to the Kolab River, which marks the boundary with Odisha, in the east. This east-west orientation along the Kanger Valley is a fact repeatedly tested. Tirathgarh Waterfalls — where the Kanger River plunges over a limestone escarpment — mark one end of the park's effective tourist and ecological boundary, while the Kolab River and the Odisha state border form the eastern limit.

Waterfalls within the Park. The park is notable for multiple waterfalls. The CGPSC 2022 question specifically asked which waterfall is NOT situated in Kanger Valley, listing Kudang Khodra, Jhulan Darha, and Shiv Ganga as waterfalls that ARE in the valley, with Khursel as the correct answer (the one that is NOT in Kanger Valley). Candidates must know this distinction.

Waterfalls within the Kanger Valley ecosystem:

  • Tirathgarh Falls — the most famous, multi-tiered cascade of the Kanger River; sometimes described as a "Niagara of Chhattisgarh" in tourism literature.
  • Kudang Khodra Falls
  • Jhulan Darha Falls
  • Shiv Ganga Falls

Waterfall NOT in Kanger Valley (tested in 2022):

  • Khursel Waterfalls — this falls is associated with a different geographic zone.

Caves. Kanger Valley is famous for its limestone caves, which are among the most spectacular in India:

  • Kailash Caves (Kailash Gufa)
  • Dandak Caves (Dandak Gufa)
  • Kotumsar Caves — among the longest natural caves in India; near-total darkness inside and home to blind fish species adapted to cave ecosystems.

Biodiversity. Kanger Valley is a biodiversity hotspot within the Deccan Plateau biotic province. Flagship fauna include:

  • Barasingha (Rucervus duvaucelii) — the swamp deer, though the specific sub-population here differs from the Kanha barasingha.
  • Wild buffalo (Bubalus arnee) — Kanger Valley holds one of the few remaining populations of the wild buffalo in India.
  • Leopard, sloth bear, gaur (Indian bison), four-horned antelope (chousingha), mouse deer.
  • Birds: Hill myna, hornbills, forest owlets.

Tribal Significance. The Kanger Valley region is home to Bisonhorn Maria and Muria Gond tribal communities. The national park was created after careful delineation of tribal settlements, and the interface between conservation and tribal rights remains a live policy debate.

Indravati National Park

Indravati National Park lies in the Bijapur district of Chhattisgarh, in the far southwest of the state near the border with Maharashtra. It is named after the Indravati River, one of the major rivers of peninsular India, which flows through or near its boundary and ultimately joins the Godavari River in Maharashtra/Telangana.

Area. Indravati National Park covers approximately 2,799 sq km — by far the largest national park in Chhattisgarh and one of the largest in central India. This makes it considerably larger than Kanger Valley (200 sq km) and Guru Ghasidas (1,440 sq km).

Tiger Reserve. Indravati is one of the original Project Tiger reserves declared in India. It functions as the Indravati Tiger Reserve with the national park as its core critical tiger habitat and surrounding reserve forests constituting the buffer zone. However, the tiger population in Indravati has been severely affected by decades of Left-Wing Extremism (Naxalism) in the Bastar region, which has made scientific monitoring and anti-poaching operations extremely difficult. Recent surveys have documented very low tiger numbers despite the park's large size and theoretically ideal habitat.

Wild Buffalo. Along with Kanger Valley, Indravati National Park is one of the last strongholds of the wild buffalo (gaur) and the wild water buffalo (Bubalus arnee) in India. The latter is now critically endangered, and Indravati holds one of the most important remaining herds.

Accessibility Challenges. The park's extreme remoteness — Bijapur district borders Maharashtra and is one of the most affected districts in the Bastar insurgency — means that tourism and research access has been severely limited for decades. This context is important for understanding why conservation outcomes here differ from more accessible sites.

Guru Ghasidas (Sanjay) National Park

Guru Ghasidas National Park — also referred to in older literature as Sanjay National Park or Sanjay-Dubri National Park — lies in the Korea district (also written as Koriya) and Surguja district of northern Chhattisgarh. This is the most northerly national park in the state and sits on the Surguja Plateau at the watershed boundary with Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh.

Historical Background. The park was originally part of the Sanjay National Park of undivided Madhya Pradesh. When Chhattisgarh was carved from MP in 2000, the park was divided, with the Chhattisgarh portion retaining its own identity. It was subsequently renamed Guru Ghasidas National Park in honour of Guru Ghasidas (1756–1850), the founder of the Satnami sect and one of the most venerated social reformers of the region — a figure of immense symbolic significance for the Satnami and Dalit communities of Chhattisgarh.

About Guru Ghasidas. Guru Ghasidas was born at Girodpuri in what is now Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara district of Chhattisgarh. He founded the Satnami movement, which challenged caste-based discrimination and preached the worship of Satnam (the true name, i.e., God without form). The Satnami community drawn from lower-caste and tribal backgrounds became one of the most significant social movements of the pre-modern period in central India. Naming the national park after him was a deliberate act of cultural and political recognition by the Chhattisgarh government — a fact that connects the geography subtopic to the culture and social reform dimensions of the syllabus. The park is a living tribute to a reformer who preached equality and forest-wisdom in precisely this landscape.

Area. The Chhattisgarh portion covers approximately 1,440 sq km.

Tiger Reserve Status. Guru Ghasidas National Park, together with the adjoining Tamor Pingla Wildlife Sanctuary in Surguja district, has been designated as the Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla Tiger Reserve by the National Tiger Conservation Authority. This makes it one of the newer tiger reserves in the country and the second tiger reserve in Chhattisgarh.

Ecology and Rivers. The park sits in the northern highlands of Chhattisgarh, characterised by dry deciduous and mixed forest. The Son River (a major tributary of the Ganga) has its headwaters in or near this highland, and the area is important both ecologically and hydrologically. The area is an important wildlife corridor connecting the Vindhya-Satpura landscape in the west with the Sarguja and Jharkhand forests in the east.

Fauna. The park supports tiger, leopard, sloth bear, wild dog, wolf, hyena, nilgai, chital, sambar, and wild boar. The vegetation is predominantly sal forest at lower elevations and mixed forest with bamboo at higher zones. The park's relative remoteness from major human habitation has preserved its wildlife, and recent camera trap surveys have confirmed tiger presence, justifying the tiger reserve designation.


Wildlife Sanctuaries of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh has multiple wildlife sanctuaries spread across its different ecological zones. The 2019 PYQ tested the district location of Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary, making district-level precision essential for all sanctuaries.

Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary

Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary is located in Raigarh district — this is the answer to the 2019 CGPSC question. Candidates must not confuse it with neighbouring districts such as Dhamtari, Raipur, or Sarguja, all of which appeared as distractors in the examination.

The sanctuary lies in the hilly terrain of eastern Chhattisgarh near the Jharkhand border. It covers approximately 277 sq km. The sanctuary is significant for its population of wild elephants — it lies within the Lemru Elephant Reserve's broader landscape. Gomarda is also known for its sal forest cover and the presence of leopards, sloth bears, and a variety of deer species.

Barnawapara Wildlife Sanctuary

Barnawapara Wildlife Sanctuary lies in Mahasamund district, north of Raipur. It covers approximately 245 sq km and is notable for its teak and bamboo forest, significant populations of chital (spotted deer), sambar, wild boar, and gaur. Barnawapara is a popular wildlife tourism destination given its proximity to Raipur (approximately 100 km).

Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary

Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary is one of the most important protected areas in the state, located in Bilaspur district (with parts extending into Anuppur district in Madhya Pradesh). It covers approximately 914 sq km on the Chhattisgarh side and forms the core zone of the Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve — the only biosphere reserve that falls within Chhattisgarh (discussed in detail in the biosphere reserve section).

Achanakmar is also a tiger reserve — it forms the core of the Achanakmar Tiger Reserve. The sanctuary is known for its sal and teak forests, tigers, leopards, wolves, wild dogs (dholes), and significant bird diversity.

Udanti Wildlife Sanctuary

Udanti Wildlife Sanctuary lies in Gariaband district (carved from Raipur). It covers approximately 232 sq km. The sanctuary is significant as one of the last refuges of the wild water buffalo in India, and has been combined with a neighbouring area as the Udanti-Sitanadi Tiger Reserve.

Sitanadi Wildlife Sanctuary

Sitanadi Wildlife Sanctuary adjoins Udanti and together they form the Udanti-Sitanadi Tiger Reserve, which is Chhattisgarh's third tiger reserve. Sitanadi lies in Dhamtari and Gariaband districts and covers approximately 553 sq km.

Tamor Pingla Wildlife Sanctuary

Tamor Pingla Wildlife Sanctuary is located in Surguja district (northern Chhattisgarh) and forms part of the Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla Tiger Reserve along with Guru Ghasidas National Park. The sanctuary lies in the hilly Surguja terrain and is important as a wildlife corridor.

Semarsot Wildlife Sanctuary

Semarsot Wildlife Sanctuary lies in Surguja district and Balrampur district in northern Chhattisgarh. It covers the forested highlands of the Sarguja region.

Badalkhol Wildlife Sanctuary

Badalkhol Wildlife Sanctuary is in Jashpur district in the northeast of Chhattisgarh, a hilly area at the boundary with Jharkhand. The sanctuary is known for its sal forests and wildlife typical of the northern Deccan.

Pamed Wildlife Sanctuary

Pamed Wildlife Sanctuary (also written as Pamad) lies in Bijapur district, in the same southern-Bastar landscape as Indravati National Park. It covers forest terrain significant for large mammals.

Bhairamgarh Wildlife Sanctuary

Bhairamgarh Wildlife Sanctuary is also located in the Bijapur district area of southern Chhattisgarh, representing the dense forests of the Bastar-Bijapur region.

Sanjay-Dubri Wildlife Sanctuary

On the Madhya Pradesh side of the partition of the original Sanjay National Park lies Sanjay-Dubri Wildlife Sanctuary — this is the MP complement to Guru Ghasidas NP. The corridor between them is ecologically critical. When reading about "Sanjay National Park," candidates must remember that the park was split at state formation — Guru Ghasidas (CG) and Sanjay-Dubri (MP) are the two halves of the original whole.

Wildlife Sanctuaries and Human-Elephant Conflict

One of the most significant and examined wildlife management issues in Chhattisgarh is human-elephant conflict (HEC). The state falls within the Central Indian Elephant Landscape, and elephants have been expanding their range southward from Jharkhand and Odisha into Raigarh, Surguja, Jashpur, and even Kabirdham districts. The Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary in Raigarh is on the edge of this elephant movement territory. The Lemru Elephant Reserve was proposed specifically to address this by giving elephants a dedicated protected corridor.

The challenges of HEC include crop depredation, destruction of human habitation, and occasional human fatalities. The Chhattisgarh government has deployed elephant-monitoring teams, early-warning systems, and compensation schemes. From an exam perspective, questions linking Gomarda or the northern CG sanctuaries to elephants are entirely plausible.

Comparison Table: Major Wildlife Sanctuaries of Chhattisgarh

Sanctuary NameDistrictApproximate AreaNotable Feature
GomardaRaigarh~277 sq kmElephants, sal forest; tested CGPSC 2019
BarnawaparaMahasamund~245 sq kmChital, gaur; popular eco-tourism
AchanakmarBilaspur (+ MP)~914 sq km (CG portion)Core of Achanakmar-Amarkantak BR; Tiger Reserve
UdantiGariaband~232 sq kmWild water buffalo; part of Udanti-Sitanadi TR
SitanadiDhamtari / Gariaband~553 sq kmPart of Udanti-Sitanadi Tiger Reserve
Tamor PinglaSurgujaPart of Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla Tiger Reserve
SemarsotSurguja / BalrampurNorthern highland forests
BadalkholJashpurSal forest, northeast border area
PamedBijapurSouthern Bastar forest

Biosphere Reserves: Achanakmar-Amarkantak

Chhattisgarh has one biosphere reserve that falls partly within its territory: the Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve (AABR).

Overview and Geographical Extent

The AABR is a trans-state biosphere reserve straddling Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. It was designated as a national biosphere reserve by the Government of India and later recognised by UNESCO as part of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. Its total area is approximately 3,835 sq km, though the exact figures for each state's portion vary by source.

On the Chhattisgarh side, the core of the biosphere reserve is the Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary (Bilaspur district). On the Madhya Pradesh side, the core includes the forests around Amarkantak — the sacred hill where the Narmada River and Son River originate. The sanctuary and Amarkantak together form a contiguous forested highland of exceptional ecological and cultural significance.

Cultural and Religious Significance

Amarkantak (the MP portion of the biosphere reserve) is one of the holiest sites in Hindu geography — it is where the Narmada rises, making it a major pilgrimage destination. This intersection of ecological and spiritual significance makes the AABR unusual: it is a biosphere reserve that must balance strict conservation with the needs of millions of pilgrims. The Chhattisgarh side (Achanakmar) is less pilgrimage-burdened and can be managed more strictly.

Biodiversity

The AABR spans the junction of the Vindhya and Satpura mountain systems and the Deccan Plateau edge. This transition zone produces extraordinary biodiversity:

  • Tiger, leopard, sloth bear, wild dog (dhole), wolf
  • Chital, sambar, nilgai, four-horned antelope
  • Mahua, sal, teak, tendu (Indian ebony, whose leaves are used for bidis)
  • Bamboo forests critical for local livelihoods
  • Over 600 plant species documented in the sanctuary alone

Tribal Communities

The AABR is home to several tribal groups, most notably the Baiga — a particularly vulnerable tribal group (PVTG: Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group) recognised for their unique forest-centred lifestyle. The Baiga's traditional shifting cultivation (Bewar) is one of the cultural practices the biosphere reserve's transition zone must accommodate. The tension between Baiga rights and conservation is a recurring policy theme in Chhattisgarh's environmental governance.

The Kanger Valley Biosphere Reserve Question

It is worth addressing directly the confusion about whether Kanger Valley is a biosphere reserve, because this is precisely what the CGPSC 2020 question was probing.

Kanger Valley National Park is both a national park AND has been designated as a biosphere reserve — specifically the Kanger Valley Biosphere Reserve under India's national biosphere reserve programme. The CGPSC 2020 question's Statement II ("Kanger Ghati is not a Biosphere Reserve") is factually FALSE, because Kanger Valley IS indeed a biosphere reserve. Statement I ("Kanger Ghati is a National Park") is TRUE. The correct answer to that question corresponds to the option that says Statement I is true and Statement II is false. Statement III about the park stretching from Tirathgarh Waterfalls to the Kolab River (Odisha boundary) in the east is TRUE based on the park's physical extent.


Tiger Reserves of Chhattisgarh

Tiger reserves are among the most exam-relevant protected-area designations because they integrate multiple legal and administrative categories into a single named site. Chhattisgarh has three tiger reserves.

Indravati Tiger Reserve

The oldest and most prominent, Indravati Tiger Reserve has its core in Indravati National Park (Bijapur district). It was among the reserves declared under the original Project Tiger in 1973, making it one of the nine founding tiger reserves of India. Despite its enormous size and biological richness, the Indravati TR has struggled with low tiger density due to insurgency, poaching, and reduced monitoring capacity.

Udanti-Sitanadi Tiger Reserve

Declared more recently, this reserve combines Udanti Wildlife Sanctuary and Sitanadi Wildlife Sanctuary in the Gariaband-Dhamtari region. The combined area is critical for the last population of wild water buffalo in central India. Conservation efforts here have a dual focus: tiger recovery and wild buffalo protection.

Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla Tiger Reserve

The newest tiger reserve in Chhattisgarh, combining Guru Ghasidas National Park (Korea/Koriya district) with Tamor Pingla Wildlife Sanctuary (Surguja district). This reserve is significant as a corridor connecting the Vindhya-Satpura landscape with forests extending toward Jharkhand.

Comparison Table: Tiger Reserves of Chhattisgarh

Tiger ReserveCore AreaBuffer / ComponentDistrictYear Declared (approx.)
IndravatiIndravati National ParkSurrounding reserve forestsBijapur1983
Udanti-SitanadiUdanti + Sitanadi WLSsReserve forestsGariaband, Dhamtari2009
Guru Ghasidas-Tamor PinglaGuru Ghasidas NPTamor Pingla WLSKoriya, Surguja2020–21

Conservation Reserves and Elephant Reserves

Lemru Elephant Reserve

Lemru Elephant Reserve in the Korba and Surguja districts has been a subject of significant political and environmental debate in Chhattisgarh. This area in the Hasdeo-Arand coalfields overlaps with some of the richest coal deposits in India, creating a direct conflict between elephant corridor conservation and coal mining. The Hasdeo-Arand forest, sometimes called the "lungs of Chhattisgarh," has been at the centre of tribal protests against coal mining clearances. The Lemru Elephant Reserve has been proposed and contested multiple times; as of the most recent policy position, an elephant reserve boundary was notified that excluded some of the most coal-rich blocks while retaining core forest.

Badalkhol-Tamorpingla Elephant Reserve is another elephant corridor in the northern Surguja-Jashpur region.

Conservation Reserves

Chhattisgarh has also notified several conservation reserves, which are smaller areas managed participatorily. These include forest patches and wetlands of local significance. While not frequently tested individually, the concept of conservation reserves as a distinct category under the WPA 2002 amendment is fair game for conceptual questions.

Hasdeo-Arand Forest and the Coal-Conservation Conflict

The Hasdeo-Arand forested region in Korba and Sarguja districts deserves special attention because it represents one of the most significant ongoing environmental-policy conflicts in India. The Hasdeo-Arand coalfields sit beneath approximately 1,700 sq km of dense forest that connects northern Chhattisgarh's sanctuaries with the Achanakmar-Amarkantak landscape to the south. The forest is home to elephants, leopards, and tribal communities — and also to some of India's richest seams of thermal coal.

The proposed Lemru Elephant Reserve, which would cover a significant portion of this forest, has been resisted by some coal development interests and supported by tribal communities and conservationists. The contested boundary of the elephant reserve — whether it should include or exclude the Parsa and other coal blocks — is a live policy debate. The Adivasi communities of the region, including the Gond tribes, have held sustained protests against forest clearance under the FRA framework, and these protests received national attention between 2021 and 2023.

For CGPSC aspirants, this conflict is relevant not just as a current affairs item but as a case study in how the WPA, FRA, Forest Conservation Act, Environmental Impact Assessment notifications, and tribal rights legislation interact (and sometimes clash) in the real-world governance of Chhattisgarh's forests.


Worked Examples & Applications

Before walking through the specific questions, it helps to understand the general approach CGPSC examiners take for this subtopic. They consistently anchor questions in concrete, named geography — a district, a river, a waterfall, a category label. The worked examples below demonstrate a method for reasoning to the correct answer even when pure recall falters: use ecological and geographical logic as a secondary check.

Working through Q1 — Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary

The 2019 CGPSC question asked: "Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary is situated?" with four district choices — Raigarh, Dhamtari, Raipur, and Sarguja.

To reason this correctly, consider the ecological and geographical logic. Gomarda lies in the forested hills of eastern Chhattisgarh, in the zone bordering Jharkhand. This terrain belongs to the Chhota Nagpur Plateau extension and the northern forest belt, which is characteristic of Raigarh district, not of the southern Dhamtari or the plains-heavy Raipur. Dhamtari is the home of the Sitanadi sanctuary and is in the southern agricultural belt. Raipur is largely agricultural and urban. Sarguja (Surguja) is further north and is associated with Tamor Pingla and Semarsot sanctuaries. Raigarh is in the northeast, precisely where Gomarda sits.

Moreover, Gomarda is associated with the elephant corridor landscape. Raigarh district connects to the elephant-movement territory linking Chhattisgarh with Jharkhand and Odisha. This ecological logic reinforces the factual answer: Raigarh district is the correct location of Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary.

The three wrong choices represent the classic distractor strategy: Dhamtari is a forest district (misleads via association with conservation), Raipur is the capital (misleads via prominence), and Sarguja is a major forest district in the north (misleads via forest association). None of these is near Raigarh in geography.

Working through Q2 — Kanger Ghati Statements

The 2020 CGPSC question presented three statements:

  • Statement I: Kanger Ghati is a National Park
  • Statement II: Kanger Ghati is not a Biosphere Reserve
  • Statement III: Kanger Ghati is spread starting from Tirathgarh Waterfalls to the Kolab River (Odisha boundary) in the east

Evaluating each:

Statement I is straightforwardly TRUE. Kanger Valley (Kanger Ghati) was notified as a national park. This is not a matter of debate.

Statement II is FALSE. Kanger Ghati has been designated as both a national park and a biosphere reserve. Under India's national biosphere reserve programme, the Kanger Valley Biosphere Reserve was recognised. Statement II's claim that it is "not a biosphere reserve" is incorrect.

Statement III requires geographical knowledge. The Kanger River flows eastward through the Kanger Valley, with the park effectively extending from the scenic Tirathgarh Waterfalls area in the west toward the Kolab River, which marks the Odisha state boundary. This is a documented description of the park's longitudinal extent. Statement III is TRUE.

Therefore: Statement I is true, Statement II is false, Statement III is true. The correct answer to the question corresponds to the choice stating "Statement I and III are true, but Statement II is false." This is a sophisticated question that rewards candidates who know both the classification (national park AND biosphere reserve) and the physical geography (west-to-east extent from Tirathgarh to Kolab/Odisha border).

The wrong choices in this question each embed a different mistake: claiming all three are true (ignores the biosphere reserve fact making Statement II wrong rather than right), claiming all three are false (completely wrong), and claiming Statement I and II are both true (accepts the false claim that Kanger Ghati is not a biosphere reserve).

Working through Q3 — Waterfalls Not in Kanger Valley

The 2022 CGPSC question asked which waterfall is NOT situated in Kanger Valley, listing Kudang Khodra, Jhulan Darha, Shiv Ganga as options alongside the correct answer Khursel.

The logic here is pure factual recall. Tirathgarh Falls, Kudang Khodra Falls, Jhulan Darha Falls, and Shiv Ganga Falls are all documented waterfalls within or associated with the Kanger Valley ecosystem in Bastar. Khursel Waterfalls is located in a different zone and is not within the Kanger Valley boundary.

The distractor design is pure memorisation-testing: all four names sound like plausible Bastar toponyns and candidates who have not specifically studied the waterfall inventory of Kanger Valley will have no systematic way to reason their way to the answer. This type of question rewards candidates who have done site-specific revision and penalises those who have only read general descriptions.

Takeaway for exam preparation: make a dedicated list of all waterfalls within Kanger Valley and those outside it, and revise until each name is firmly associated with its location.


The three CGPSC PYQs on this subtopic span six years and cover three different sites. Together they form a clear picture of how CGPSC approaches wildlife and protected areas in its examinations.

Analysing the three CGPSC questions from 2019, 2020, and 2022 on this subtopic reveals a consistent and instructive pattern.

First, CGPSC examiners prefer precision over concept. All three questions tested specific facts — a district name, a classification status, a waterfall name — rather than asking candidates to reason about, say, why biosphere reserves have a zonal structure or what the Wildlife Protection Act requires for declaring a national park. This tells candidates clearly: memorisation of precise facts is as important as conceptual understanding.

Second, the examiner returns repeatedly to Kanger Valley / Kanger Ghati, which appeared implicitly in 2020 (on classification) and 2022 (on waterfalls). Kanger Valley is Chhattisgarh's most iconic protected area, uniquely combining national park status, biosphere reserve designation, cave systems of national importance, and the Bastar tribal landscape. It will likely appear in CGPSC again. Every candidate must master Kanger Valley comprehensively.

Third, the distractor design is consistently geographic. In the 2019 Gomarda question, all four options are actual Chhattisgarh districts — the question cannot be answered by ruling out implausible options; candidates must know the correct district. In the 2022 waterfall question, all four options are actual Bastar-region waterfall names. This pattern means candidates cannot rely on elimination of obviously wrong options.

Fourth, no question has yet tested the technical legal distinctions between the WPA categories in depth — for instance, which section of the WPA governs national parks, or what the precise difference in boundary-alteration procedure is between parks and sanctuaries. These definitional questions are common in UPSC and some other PSC exams. CGPSC has so far preferred applied knowledge over statutory knowledge. However, the 2020 question's dual-status test (national park AND biosphere reserve) does require candidates to understand that these are distinct classification systems that can overlap — which is a moderate level of conceptual demand.

Fifth, the questions span three different years and test three different sites (Gomarda, Kanger Ghati, waterfalls within Kanger). This breadth suggests that future questions will not repeat exactly but will continue to probe the broader map of Chhattisgarh's protected areas.

Sixth, CGPSC has not yet directly tested Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, Indravati National Park, Guru Ghasidas National Park, or the full complement of tiger reserves. All of these are high-probability subjects for future papers. Candidates who have mastered only Kanger Valley (because of its repeated appearance) are exposed to questions on any of these untested sites.

Seventh, the 2020 question's multi-statement format is increasingly common in PSC examinations. It requires candidates to evaluate each claim independently without being swayed by partial correctness. This skill — disaggregating a compound claim into its constituent assertions and verifying each — is one of the most valuable exam techniques for this subtopic. Practicing similar self-test questions (e.g., "Which of these statements about Indravati National Park is/are correct?") is the recommended preparation method.

Eighth, none of the three PYQs required knowledge of statutes, section numbers, or committee names. CGPSC has consistently tested applied geography rather than legal detail. This does not mean legal knowledge is irrelevant — a future paper could change this pattern — but it does mean that candidates should prioritise the geographical and ecological facts of CG's protected areas before trying to memorise WPA section numbers.


What Else Could Be Asked

Pro Table

Predicted questions & preparation strategy

See which topics are most likely to appear next — forecasted from years of PYQ patterns.

Unlock with Pro →

Common Mistakes & Traps

Trap 1: Confusing Gomarda's District with Sarguja or Raipur

The most common error on the 2019 question is selecting Sarguja (a prominently forested district in the north) instead of Raigarh. Sarguja is associated with the Tamor Pingla and Semarsot sanctuaries; Raigarh is the district for Gomarda. The fix is a dedicated district-to-sanctuary mapping memorised through a mnemonic or table.

Trap 2: Not Knowing Kanger Valley is BOTH a National Park and a Biosphere Reserve

Many candidates know Kanger Valley as a national park (the most visible classification) but are uncertain about its biosphere reserve status. The 2020 question exploited precisely this uncertainty by presenting Statement II as "Kanger Ghati is NOT a biosphere reserve" — a statement designed to trap those who only half-remember the site's dual classification. The safeguard is to memorise "Kanger Valley = NP + BR" as a fixed unit.

Trap 3: Misidentifying Waterfalls Within vs Outside Kanger Valley

The 2022 question is a pure recall trap. Khursel Falls is the outsider; Kudang Khodra, Jhulan Darha, Shiv Ganga, and Tirathgarh are within the valley. There is no logical shortcut — memorisation is required. The trap is especially effective because all the names are unfamiliar to candidates who have not studied Bastar's geography in detail.

Trap 4: Equating Biosphere Reserve with National Park

A biosphere reserve is larger than, and distinct from, the national park within it. The Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve is NOT the same as Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary — the biosphere reserve encompasses the sanctuary (as its core zone) plus buffer and transition areas. Similarly, the Kanger Valley Biosphere Reserve is distinct from but overlapping with the Kanger Valley National Park. Candidates who conflate the two will struggle with multi-classification questions.

Trap 5: Misremembering the Indravati River Association

Indravati National Park is named after the Indravati River, but candidates sometimes confuse the association — misattributing the Indravati River to a different park or associating the Kanger River with Indravati NP. The Kanger River flows through Kanger Valley National Park; the Indravati River flows through the Bijapur region associated with Indravati National Park.

Trap 6: Thinking Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary = Achanakmar Tiger Reserve = AABR Core

These three names refer to overlapping but legally distinct designations for the same physical area. The sanctuary (WPA) is the core zone of the AABR (UNESCO/GoI). The tiger reserve (NTCA) uses the sanctuary as its critical tiger habitat. Knowing the layering prevents confusion in multi-option questions.

Trap 7: Overstating the Number of National Parks

Chhattisgarh has exactly three national parks: Kanger Valley, Indravati, and Guru Ghasidas. Candidates who are uncertain sometimes add Barnawapara or Achanakmar to this list — both are wildlife sanctuaries, not national parks.

Trap 8: Confusing Kanger River with Kanker District

The Kanger River flows through Kanger Valley National Park. The Kanker district is a separate administrative district in Chhattisgarh. The two spellings (Kanger/Kanker) are close enough that some sources confuse them, but they refer to entirely different entities: one is a river and national park in Bastar/Jagdalpur, the other is a district near the northern edge of the Bastar region. When a question refers to "Kanger" it almost always means the valley/river/park; "Kanker" refers to the district.

Trap 9: Thinking Project Tiger Reserves Have Independent Protected Status

A tiger reserve is not a separate legal protection category — it does not exist under the WPA independent of the national park or sanctuary at its core. When a tiger reserve is declared, the underlying national park/sanctuary continues to derive its protection from the WPA. The tiger reserve designation adds NTCA oversight, special funding, and camera trap monitoring, but does not change the legal boundary or the permissible human activities. This distinction matters for questions that ask what happens if a tiger reserve boundary is changed (the WPA procedures still apply).

Trap 10: Misidentifying Which Part of the AABR Is in Which State

The Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve spans two states: the Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary part is in Chhattisgarh (Bilaspur district), and the Amarkantak hill and its surroundings are in Madhya Pradesh (Anuppur district). Questions may ask which state hosts a particular feature. The rivers Narmada and Son originate at Amarkantak (MP side). The tiger habitat is principally on the Achanakmar (CG) side. These are distinct facts that candidates sometimes mix up.


Memory Aids & Mnemonics

Mnemonic 1: "KIG" — The Three National Parks of Chhattisgarh

K – I – G: Kanger Valley, Indravati, Guru Ghasidas

Recall phrase: "Keep It Green" = Kanger (K), Indravati (I), Guru Ghasidas (G)

Associate each letter with its key fact:

  • K = Kanger Valley → Bastar → Caves + Waterfalls + Biosphere Reserve
  • I = Indravati → Bijapur → Wild Buffalo + Oldest Tiger Reserve
  • G = Guru Ghasidas → Koriya/Sarguja → Named after Satnami reformer

Mnemonic 2: "BAGS" — Wildlife Sanctuaries by District Region

For the four most exam-tested sanctuaries and their district regions:

Barnawapara – Mahasamund (remember: Big Mixed forests) Achanakmar – Bilaspur (remember: Achanakmar Bears tigers) Gomarda – Raigarh (remember: Gomarda Roams in Raigarh) Udanti – Gariaband (remember: Udanti's Great buffalo)

Compressed: BAGU → Barnawapara-Mahasamund, Achanakmar-Bilaspur, Gomarda-Raigarh, Udanti-Gariaband.

Mnemonic 3: "TKS" — Waterfalls INSIDE Kanger Valley

To remember the waterfalls that are IN Kanger Valley: Tirathgarh, Kudang Khodra, Jhulan Darha, Shiv Ganga

Phrase: "The Kanger Journey Starts" → Tirathgarh, Kudang, Jhulan, Shiv Ganga

And the one that is OUT: Khursel is the K that doesn't belong. "The Khursel Kept out of Kanger."

Mnemonic 4: Tiger Reserves — Age Order

Indravati (oldest, 1983) → Udanti-Sitanadi (middle) → Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla (newest, 2020–21)

Sentence: "I Urge Great conservation" → Indravati, Udanti-Sitanadi, Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla (oldest to newest).

Mnemonic 5: Kanger Valley Core Facts — "BCTK"

Biosphere Reserve status (yes — dual with National Park) Caves — Kotumsar, Kailash, Dandak (famous cave systems) Tirathgarh to Kolab — west-to-east extent (tested CGPSC 2020) Khурsel is NOT in the Valley (tested CGPSC 2022)

Remember: "Because Caves Travel to Kanger" = B-C-T-K = dual status, caves, Tirathgarh-Kolab extent, Khursel excluded.

Visual Association Technique for Districts

A good technique for remembering sanctuary–district pairs is to create a mental map of Chhattisgarh divided into three horizontal belts:

North belt (Surguja, Koriya, Jashpur, Balrampur): Tamor Pingla, Semarsot, Badalkhol sanctuaries; Guru Ghasidas NP Central belt (Bilaspur, Raigarh, Mahasamund, Dhamtari, Gariaband): Achanakmar (Bilaspur), Gomarda (Raigarh), Barnawapara (Mahasamund), Sitanadi-Udanti (Dhamtari-Gariaband) South belt (Bastar/Jagdalpur, Bijapur, Kanker, Narayanpur): Kanger Valley NP (Jagdalpur/Bastar), Indravati NP (Bijapur), Pamed, Bhairamgarh (Bijapur)

When a question names a sanctuary, place it on this mental map — north (Surguja belt), central (Bilaspur-Raigarh belt), or south (Bastar belt) — and this immediately constrains the possible districts.


Quick Revision

National Parks of Chhattisgarh (exactly 3):

  • Kanger Valley NP — Bastar/Jagdalpur; ~200 sq km; also a Biosphere Reserve; Kanger River; Tirathgarh Falls, Kotumsar Caves; Tirathgarh (west) to Kolab/Odisha (east); wild buffalo, barasingha
  • Indravati NP — Bijapur district; ~2,799 sq km; Indravati River; oldest Project Tiger reserve (1983); wild water buffalo, tiger
  • Guru Ghasidas NP — Koriya/Korea + Surguja; ~1,440 sq km; named after Satnami reformer; Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla Tiger Reserve (newest)

Biosphere Reserve in CG (1):

  • Achanakmar-Amarkantak BR — spans CG (core: Achanakmar WLS, Bilaspur) + MP (Amarkantak); UNESCO recognised; Baiga PVTG; Narmada + Son rivers originate in MP portion

Tiger Reserves of CG (3):

  • Indravati TR (oldest, 1983) — Bijapur
  • Udanti-Sitanadi TR — Gariaband + Dhamtari; wild water buffalo flagship
  • Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla TR (newest, ~2021) — Koriya + Surguja

Key Sanctuary–District Pairs (must know):

  • GomardaRaigarh (tested CGPSC 2019)
  • Barnawapara → Mahasamund
  • Achanakmar → Bilaspur
  • Udanti → Gariaband
  • Sitanadi → Gariaband/Dhamtari
  • Badalkhol → Jashpur
  • Tamor Pingla → Surguja

Kanger Valley specific facts:

  • Also a Biosphere Reserve (both NP and BR)
  • Extends: Tirathgarh Falls (west) → Kolab River / Odisha border (east)
  • Waterfalls INSIDE: Tirathgarh, Kudang Khodra, Jhulan Darha, Shiv Ganga
  • Waterfall NOT inside: Khursel (tested CGPSC 2022)
  • Famous caves: Kotumsar (blind fish), Kailash, Dandak

Legal categories recap:

  • Strictest protection = National Park (boundary change needs Legislature)
  • More flexible = Wildlife Sanctuary (boundary change by State Govt order)
  • Umbrella (core + buffer + transition) = Biosphere Reserve (Central Govt / UNESCO)
  • Tiger/Elephant Reserves = programmatic overlay (NTCA/Project Elephant), not a separate WPA category

Quick count:

  • National Parks: 3 (Kanger Valley, Indravati, Guru Ghasidas)
  • Tiger Reserves: 3 (Indravati, Udanti-Sitanadi, Guru Ghasidas-Tamor Pingla)
  • Biosphere Reserves (in CG): 1 (Achanakmar-Amarkantak, trans-state with MP)
  • Wildlife Sanctuaries: ~11 (approximate, varies with latest notifications)

Landmark associated rivers:

  • Kanger Valley NP — Kanger River (tributary of Indravati)
  • Indravati NP — Indravati River (tributary of Godavari)
  • Guru Ghasidas NP — Son River headwaters region
  • Achanakmar WLS / AABR — Narmada + Son originate at Amarkantak (MP portion)

Distinguishing features to memorise:

  • Only NP that is also a Biosphere Reserve in CG: Kanger Valley
  • Only NP named after a social reformer: Guru Ghasidas
  • Largest NP in CG by area: Indravati (~2,799 sq km)
  • Oldest Tiger Reserve in CG (and founding-era Project Tiger): Indravati
  • Sanctuary for wild water buffalo: Udanti and Indravati
  • Sanctuary associated with elephants in the east: Gomarda (Raigarh)
  • Biosphere Reserve spanning two states: Achanakmar-Amarkantak (CG + MP)
  • UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves member: Achanakmar-Amarkantak

For the 2019 question: Gomarda = Raigarh (not Dhamtari, not Raipur, not Sarguja) For the 2020 question: Kanger Ghati IS both a National Park AND a Biosphere Reserve; it extends from Tirathgarh Falls (west) to Kolab River/Odisha (east) For the 2022 question: Khursel Falls is NOT in Kanger Valley; Kudang Khodra, Jhulan Darha, Shiv Ganga ARE inside

Practice these PYQs

Test yourself with the actual 3 questions from CGPSC - SSE

Test yourself on National parks, wildlife sanctuaries and biosphere reserves

3 real CGPSC - SSE PYQs — answer now, no signup needed.

CGPSC PYQ 1 (2023)Reasoning

It is the study of body language used for non-verbal communication

  1. Haptics
  2. Proxemics
  3. Kinesics
  4. None of the above

Answer: C. Kinesics

CGPSC PYQ 2 (2023)Data Interpretation

Study the following table and answer the questions based on it. Expenditures of a company (in lakh) per annum over the given years Year | Salary | Fuel and Transport | Bonus | Interest on loans | Taxes 1998 | 288 | 98 | 3.00 | 23.4 | 83 1999 | 342 | 112 | 2.52 | 32.5 | 108 2000 | 324 | 101 | 3.84 | 41.6 | 74 2001 | 336 | 133 | 3.68 | 36.4 | 88 2002 | 420 | 142 | 3.96 | 49.4 | 98

What is the average amount of interest per year which the company had to pay during this period ?

  1. ₹ 33.72 lakhs
  2. ₹ 32.43 lakhs
  3. ₹ 34.18 lakhs
  4. ₹ 36.66 lakhs

Answer: D. ₹ 36.66 lakhs

CGPSC PYQ 3 (2023)English

सही वाक्य हे :

  1. तैं ह तोर काम करबे ।
  2. हमन ह हमर काम करबो ।
  3. ओमन ह अपन काम करहीं ।
  4. मैं ह मोर काम करहूँ ।

Answer: C. ओमन ह अपन काम करहीं ।

Free sample · Question 1 of 3

Reasoning · 2023

It is the study of body language used for non-verbal communication

Frequently Asked Questions — National parks, wildlife sanctuaries and biosphere reserves

3 questions on National parks, wildlife sanctuaries and biosphere reserves have appeared in CGPSC Prelims across papers from 2019–2022. This makes it a niche topic in the Geography section.