pscprep.ai
BlogPricingAbout

Explore category

All State PCS Exams

Exam hubs, syllabus, strategy — and public PYQ attempt + insight pages.

National exam

UPSC CSE

PYQs, mocks, AI planner — Prelims Paper I & II.

State PCS

UPSCAvailableUPSC Civil Services (CSE)BPSCAvailableBihar (BPSC - CCE)CGPSCAvailableChhattisgarh (CGPSC - SSE)MPPSCAvailableMadhya Pradesh (MPPSC - SSE)MPSCAvailableMaharashtra (MPSC - Rajyaseva)OPSCAvailableOdisha (OPSC - OCS)RPSCAvailableRajasthan (RPSC - RAS)TNPSCAvailableTamil Nadu (TNPSC - Group 1)UPPSCAvailableUttar Pradesh (UPPSC - PCS)WBCSAvailableWest Bengal (WBCS)HPSCComing soonHaryana (HPSC)JKPSCComing soonJammu and Kashmir (JKPSC)JPSCComing soonJharkhand (JPSC)KPSCComing soonKarnataka (KPSC)PPSCComing soonPunjab (PPSC)UKPSCComing soonUttarakhand (UKPSC)
Current AffairsToolsFor InstitutesDashboard
UPSCState PCSCurrent AffairsToolsPricingBlogAboutInstitutes
pscprep.ai

Smart exam prep for UPSC and State PCS aspirants with adaptive planning, daily current affairs, and exam-focused practice.

Get the weekly digest

Top current affairs + exam tips, every Monday morning.

Explore

BlogUPSCState PCS ExamsExam ScheduleAttempt PYQPYQ trendsCurrent AffairsToolsPricingAboutContactLog inFor Institutes

Connect With Us

hello@pscprep.aiFollow on FacebookFollow on Instagram

Get the App

Google PlayApp Store — coming soon

Copyright © 2026 PSCPrep.ai. All rights reserved.

Legal business name: EXAMBEES

Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsCancellation/Refund Policy
Current AffairsInternational Relations

US Offers No Regret Over Indians Killed In Strike. Shashi Tharoor Hits Out

Sunday, 14 June 20266 min read1,088 words20

Get the weekly digest

Top current affairs + exam tips, every Monday morning.

📝 AI-generated analysis for exam preparation. This is original educational content curated for competitive exam aspirants.

International RelationsDeep Analysisgeopoliticsneighbourhoodstrategic partnershipsglobal orgs

In this article

ContextBackground & Historical EvolutionKey Points & FactsMulti-Dimensional AnalysisWay Forward

Context

The news article reports that Shashi Tharoor, a prominent Indian politician and Member of Parliament, has criticized the United States for its actions in a strike that resulted in the deaths of Indian nationals. The incident occurred in the Gulf region, where a US strike targeted a non-compliant ship. Tharoor specifically questioned why non-lethal means were not employed to stop the vessel before resorting to lethal force. He expressed that the US has shown no regret over the killing of Indians in this strike. This raises significant questions about the rules of engagement in maritime security operations, the protection of Indian diaspora abroad, and the diplomatic response from India. The incident highlights the complexities of international law governing the use of force on the high seas and the need for accountability in such operations.

Background & Historical Evolution

The issue of maritime security and the use of force against non-compliant vessels has a long history. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), adopted in 1982, provides the legal framework for maritime activities, including the rights of states to board and inspect ships suspected of illegal activities. However, UNCLOS does not explicitly authorize the use of lethal force against non-compliant ships. Over the years, there have been several incidents where states have used force against vessels, leading to civilian casualties. For example, in 2010, the Israeli Navy's raid on the Gaza flotilla resulted in the deaths of activists, sparking international condemnation. Similarly, the US has been involved in maritime interdictions in the Gulf region, often targeting ships suspected of smuggling weapons or drugs. The use of non-lethal measures, such as warning shots, disabling engines, or using water cannons, has been advocated by human rights groups and some governments to minimize casualties. India has historically been cautious in its response to such incidents, balancing its strategic partnership with the US with the need to protect its citizens abroad. The current incident adds to the ongoing debate about the proportionality of force in maritime security operations.

Key Points & Facts

  • Shashi Tharoor, an Indian MP and former UN Under-Secretary-General, criticized the US for its strike on a non-compliant ship in the Gulf region that killed Indians.
  • Tharoor questioned why non-lethal means were not used to stop the non-compliant ship before resorting to lethal force.
  • The US has expressed no regret over the killing of Indians in the strike, according to the article.
  • The incident occurred in the Gulf region, a strategic waterway for global trade and security.
  • The strike targeted a non-compliant ship, which may have been suspected of illegal activities such as smuggling or unauthorized entry.
  • The use of non-lethal measures in maritime interdictions is a key aspect of international law and rules of engagement.
  • The incident raises questions about the protection of Indian diaspora abroad, particularly in conflict zones or high-risk areas.
  • India's diplomatic response to the incident will be crucial in shaping bilateral relations with the US.

Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Political & Constitutional Dimensions: The government's position is likely to be cautious, balancing the need to protect Indian citizens with the strategic partnership with the US. The opposition, led by figures like Shashi Tharoor, may demand a stronger response, including a formal protest or demand for compensation. The incident also touches on India's constitutional duty to protect its citizens abroad, as outlined in Article 51 of the Constitution, which promotes respect for international law and treaty obligations. The government may face pressure in Parliament to explain its diplomatic efforts.

Economic & Financial Impact: The Gulf region is critical for India's energy security and trade, with a significant portion of oil imports passing through these waters. Any escalation in maritime security incidents could disrupt shipping routes, leading to higher insurance premiums and trade costs. The killing of Indian nationals may also affect remittances from the diaspora in the Gulf, which are a key source of foreign exchange. However, the immediate financial impact is likely to be limited unless the incident leads to broader diplomatic tensions.

Social Dimensions: The incident has a direct impact on the families of the deceased Indians, who may seek justice and compensation. It also affects the broader Indian diaspora in the Gulf, who may feel vulnerable to similar incidents. The lack of regret from the US could be seen as a disregard for Indian lives, potentially fueling anti-US sentiment in India. The incident also highlights the need for better consular support and emergency response mechanisms for Indians abroad.

Governance & Administrative Aspects: The incident raises questions about India's ability to protect its citizens in international waters. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) must coordinate with the US to ensure accountability and prevent future incidents. There may be calls for India to enhance its maritime surveillance capabilities to monitor such incidents in real-time. The incident also tests the effectiveness of existing bilateral mechanisms, such as the India-US Strategic Dialogue, in addressing such crises.

International Perspective: The incident is governed by international law, particularly UNCLOS, which outlines the rights and responsibilities of states in maritime interdictions. The use of lethal force against non-compliant ships is a contentious issue, with some states arguing that it violates the principle of proportionality. The US may cite security concerns or the need to prevent illegal activities as justification. India could raise the issue in multilateral forums like the UN or the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to push for clearer guidelines on the use of force. The incident also has implications for India's relations with other Gulf states, which may be watching the diplomatic response closely.

Way Forward

In the short term, India should demand a formal explanation from the US regarding the incident and seek compensation for the families of the deceased. The MEA should also issue a strong diplomatic note expressing concern over the lack of regret. Medium-term measures could include strengthening bilateral agreements with the US on maritime security to ensure that non-lethal means are prioritized in future interdictions. India could also work with other countries in the Gulf region to establish a joint mechanism for monitoring and responding to non-compliant ships. Long-term, India should advocate for clearer international guidelines under UNCLOS or the IMO on the use of force in maritime operations, drawing on best practices from countries like Canada and Australia, which have protocols for using non-lethal measures. Additionally, India should enhance its own maritime capabilities, including the deployment of naval assets to protect Indian vessels and citizens in high-risk areas. The government should also consider setting up a dedicated task force for diaspora protection in conflict zones.

What can be asked in exam?

  • •Prelims angle: Shashi Tharoor is a Member of Parliament and former UN Under-Secretary-General.
  • •Prelims angle: The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was adopted in 1982.
  • •Prelims angle: UNCLOS provides the legal framework for maritime activities, including the rights of states to board and inspect ships.
  • •Mains angle: Discuss the legal and ethical implications of using lethal force against non-compliant ships in international waters, with reference to UNCLOS and the principle of proportionality. (GS-II, 250 words)
  • •Mains angle: Examine the role of the Indian diaspora in India's foreign policy and the mechanisms available to protect Indian citizens abroad. (GS-II, 250 words)

Test yourself · no signup needed

Attempt OPSC previous-year questions free

Try 3 real OPSC PYQs, see the answer instantly, then unlock the full set free.

OPSC PYQ 1 (2022) — Science

Genetic engineering, a revolutionary branch of biotechnology, continues to evolve rapidly, transforming the way we approach medicine, agriculture and various scientific endeavours. Recent developments in this field highlight both the immense potential and ethical considerations that come with the power to manipulate DNA. In the medical realm, gene editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have gained prominence. These tools offer unprecedented precision in modifying genes, holding promise for treating genetic disorders. In a groundbreaking clinical trial, researchers successfully used gene editing to treat sickle cell anaemia. The patient’s own modified cells were reintroduced into their body, resulting in reduced symptoms and an improved quality of life. In agriculture, genetic engineering is driving advancements in crop production and food security. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops has enabled plants to resist pests, withstand harsh climates and improve nutritional content. For instance, GM rice has been biofortified to contain higher levels of essential vitamins, potentially combating malnutrition in regions where rice is a staple food. However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns. The potential for creating “designer babies” through gene editing has sparked debates about the boundaries of genetic manipulation. The question of whether it’s ethical to alter human DNA to enhance physical or cognitive traits continues to challenge bioethicists, policymakers and society at large. Data indicates the exponential growth of genetic engineering research. In the past decade, the number of scientific publications related to CRISPR technology has multiplied significantly. In 2010, there were approximately 150 CRISPR-related publications; by 2020, that number had soared to over 9,000. This surge demonstrates the profound impact of genetic engineering on the scientific community. As we navigate this brave new world of genetic engineering, striking a balance between innovation and ethical considerations remains paramount. The potential to cure genetic diseases, enhance food security and make leaps in scientific understanding is immense. However, careful consideration and collaboration are necessary to ensure that the benefits are realized while addressing the ethical complexities that accompany these technological breakthroughs.

Which gene editing technology has gained prominence recently?

  1. It is used for creating GM crops
  2. It is a tool for gene editing
  3. It enhances physical traits
  4. It is used in biofortification

Answer: A. It is used for creating GM crops

OPSC PYQ 2 (2022) — English Comprehension

EMBEZZLE

In the following question, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word: EMBEZZLE

  1. Misappropriate
  2. Balance
  3. Remunerate
  4. Clear

Answer: A. Misappropriate

OPSC PYQ 3 (2023) — Reasoning

How many pairs of letters are there in the word 'CASTRAPHONE' which have as many letters between them in the word as in the alphabet?

  1. 3
  2. 4
  3. 5
  4. 6

Answer: D. 6

Free sample · Question 1 of 3

Science · 2022

Direction / Passage

Genetic engineering, a revolutionary branch of biotechnology, continues to evolve rapidly, transforming the way we approach medicine, agriculture and various scientific endeavours. Recent developments in this field highlight both the immense potential and ethical considerations that come with the power to manipulate DNA. In the medical realm, gene editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have gained prominence. These tools offer unprecedented precision in modifying genes, holding promise for treating genetic disorders. In a groundbreaking clinical trial, researchers successfully used gene editing to treat sickle cell anaemia. The patient’s own modified cells were reintroduced into their body, resulting in reduced symptoms and an improved quality of life. In agriculture, genetic engineering is driving advancements in crop production and food security. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops has enabled plants to resist pests, withstand harsh climates and improve nutritional content. For instance, GM rice has been biofortified to contain higher levels of essential vitamins, potentially combating malnutrition in regions where rice is a staple food. However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns. The potential for creating “designer babies” through gene editing has sparked debates about the boundaries of genetic manipulation. The question of whether it’s ethical to alter human DNA to enhance physical or cognitive traits continues to challenge bioethicists, policymakers and society at large. Data indicates the exponential growth of genetic engineering research. In the past decade, the number of scientific publications related to CRISPR technology has multiplied significantly. In 2010, there were approximately 150 CRISPR-related publications; by 2020, that number had soared to over 9,000. This surge demonstrates the profound impact of genetic engineering on the scientific community. As we navigate this brave new world of genetic engineering, striking a balance between innovation and ethical considerations remains paramount. The potential to cure genetic diseases, enhance food security and make leaps in scientific understanding is immense. However, careful consideration and collaboration are necessary to ensure that the benefits are realized while addressing the ethical complexities that accompany these technological breakthroughs.

Which gene editing technology has gained prominence recently?

Continue with exam actions

Explore more in International RelationsOpen 14 Jun digestAttempt OPSC PYQ — free, no signupAttempt MPPSC PYQ — free, no signup

This week's CA quiz · 20 questions

Cross-topic questions from recent current affairs

Start →

More on International Relations

President Murmu's Historic Romania Visit Boosts India-Romania Trade and Strategic Ties

27 Jul

President Murmu's Romania Visit: India-Romania Business Forum 2026 Explained

25 Jul

US Rolls Out Permanent Tariffs Under Section 301, India Retains Lower 10% Rate

24 Jul

Andhra Pradesh UAE Food Cluster: APEDB's ₹100-Crore Chittoor Processing Push

23 Jul