pscprep.ai
BlogPricingAbout

Explore category

All State PCS Exams

Exam hubs, syllabus, strategy — and public PYQ attempt + insight pages.

National exam

UPSC CSE

PYQs, mocks, AI planner — Prelims Paper I & II.

State PCS

UPSCAvailableUPSC Civil Services (CSE)BPSCAvailableBihar (BPSC - CCE)CGPSCAvailableChhattisgarh (CGPSC - SSE)MPPSCAvailableMadhya Pradesh (MPPSC - SSE)MPSCAvailableMaharashtra (MPSC - Rajyaseva)OPSCAvailableOdisha (OPSC - OCS)RPSCAvailableRajasthan (RPSC - RAS)TNPSCAvailableTamil Nadu (TNPSC - Group 1)UPPSCAvailableUttar Pradesh (UPPSC - PCS)WBCSAvailableWest Bengal (WBCS)HPSCComing soonHaryana (HPSC)JKPSCComing soonJammu and Kashmir (JKPSC)JPSCComing soonJharkhand (JPSC)KPSCComing soonKarnataka (KPSC)PPSCComing soonPunjab (PPSC)UKPSCComing soonUttarakhand (UKPSC)
Current AffairsToolsFor InstitutesDashboard
UPSCState PCSCurrent AffairsToolsPricingBlogAboutInstitutes
pscprep.ai

Smart exam prep for UPSC and State PCS aspirants with adaptive planning, daily current affairs, and exam-focused practice.

Get the weekly digest

Top current affairs + exam tips, every Monday morning.

Explore

BlogUPSCState PCS ExamsExam ScheduleAttempt PYQPYQ trendsCurrent AffairsToolsPricingAboutContactLog inFor Institutes

Connect With Us

hello@pscprep.aiFollow on FacebookFollow on Instagram

Get the App

Google PlayApp Store — coming soon

Copyright © 2026 PSCPrep.ai. All rights reserved.

Legal business name: EXAMBEES

Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsCancellation/Refund Policy
Current AffairsEnvironment

Centre Mulls Carbon Capture Tech Promotion Framework With Rs 20,000 Crore Outlay

Wednesday, 17 June 20265 min read984 words20

Get the weekly digest

Top current affairs + exam tips, every Monday morning.

📝 AI-generated analysis for exam preparation. This is original educational content curated for competitive exam aspirants.

EnvironmentDeep Analysisclimate changerenewable energypollutionindustry

In this article

ContextBackground & Historical EvolutionKey Points & FactsMulti-Dimensional AnalysisWay Forward

Context

The Indian government is considering a framework to promote carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies, with a proposed outlay of Rs 20,000 crore. This initiative aligns with India’s commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070, as announced at COP26. Carbon capture technology is seen as a critical tool to reduce emissions from hard-to-abate sectors such as steel, cement, and chemicals, where direct electrification or renewable energy integration is challenging. The framework is reportedly being developed by the Department of Science and Technology and other ministries, aiming to incentivize research, development, and deployment of CCUS projects. The timeline for implementation and specific policy instruments are yet to be finalized, but the move signals a strategic shift towards technology-driven climate mitigation.

Background & Historical Evolution

India's climate policy has evolved from being a largely defensive stance to proactive mitigation. Key milestones include the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) in 2008, which established eight national missions, including the National Mission on Enhanced Energy Efficiency and the National Solar Mission. In 2015, India submitted its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement, pledging to reduce emissions intensity of GDP by 33-35% by 2030 from 2005 levels, and achieve 40% cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030. In 2021 at COP26 (Glasgow), India announced an updated NDC with five key targets, including reaching 500 GW non-fossil energy capacity by 2030, reducing carbon intensity by 45% by 2030 from 2005 levels, and achieving net-zero emissions by 2070. Carbon capture has been discussed intermittently. In 2020, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas launched a policy for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) using CO2 injection, but large-scale CCUS deployment remains nascent. The proposed Rs 20,000 crore framework marks the first explicit, dedicated financial outlay for CCUS promotion.

Key Points & Facts

  • The central government is mulling a Carbon Capture Technology Promotion Framework.
  • The proposed outlay for the framework is Rs 20,000 crore.
  • The initiative aligns with India's net-zero emissions target year: 2070.
  • Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology is intended for hard-to-abate sectors like steel, cement, and chemicals.
  • India's net-zero commitment was announced at COP26 in Glasgow in 2021.
  • The Department of Science and Technology is likely involved in formulating the framework.
  • Earlier policy efforts include the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) policy by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in 2020.
  • India's current NDC targets include reducing emissions intensity by 45% by 2030 (from 2005 levels).

Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Political & Constitutional Dimensions: The proposal reflects the government's commitment to climate action, consistent with its declared net-zero goal. It also aligns with international pressure on major emitters to adopt advanced mitigation technologies. The government sees CCUS as a way to decarbonize without harming industrial competitiveness. Critics, including some environmental groups, argue that CCUS is an expensive distraction, prolonging the life of fossil fuel infrastructure, and that India should prioritize cheaper renewable energy and energy efficiency. Constitutionally, environmental protection is a Directive Principle (Article 48A) and a Fundamental Duty (Article 51A(g)). The central government has the authority to frame such policies under its residual powers and under the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

Economic & Financial Impact: The Rs 20,000 crore outlay is a significant fiscal commitment. It could support pilot projects, R&D, and possibly viability gap funding. Over time, if CCUS reduces CO2 emissions, it could help Indian industry avoid carbon border taxes (e.g., EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism), protecting export competitiveness. However, the technology remains capital-intensive, with costs currently $50-100 per tonne of CO2 captured. Without further cost reductions, the framework may not attract adequate private investment. Economists note that the same funds might yield higher emission reductions if invested in renewables or green hydrogen. The government must design subsidies carefully to avoid stranded assets.

Social Dimensions: CCUS deployment could create new skilled jobs in engineering, construction, and monitoring, especially in industrial regions. However, there are concerns over environmental justice: CO2 storage (e.g., geological sequestration) raises risks of leakage and land-use conflicts. Communities near storage sites may oppose projects due to lack of trust or inadequate consultation. The technology also does not address local air pollution from coal or industrial emissions, which disproportionately affects low-income communities. The government will need to ensure robust safety standards, public disclosure, and grievance mechanisms to ensure equitable outcomes.

Governance & Administrative Aspects: Implementation challenges include regulatory gaps: India currently lacks a comprehensive legal framework for CO2 transport, injection, and long-term liability. The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) has limited scope. There is no single nodal agency for CCUS; coordination among Ministries of Power, Petroleum, Environment, and Science & Technology is weak. Institutional capacity for monitoring and verifying stored CO2 is nascent. Federalism issues could arise if states oppose storage projects. The government will need to create a dedicated regulatory body or amend existing laws, such as the Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948, to accommodate CO2 storage.

Way Forward

Short-term measures (1-2 years): Establish a national CCUS policy framework with clear targets and timelines. Include tax incentives and viability gap funding for at least 2-3 pilot projects in steel and cement sectors. Create a regulatory sandbox for CO2 transport and storage. Medium-term reforms (3-5 years): Enact a comprehensive law covering liability, monitoring, and storage standards, possibly modeled on the EU's CCS Directive (2009/31/EC). Set up a dedicated CCUS authority under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Mandate CO2 capture for new large industrial plants in phases, with cost support declining over time. Long-term vision (by 2040): Achieve cost-competitive CCUS through innovation, scale, and carbon pricing. Integrate CCUS with green hydrogen and enhanced oil recovery to create a circular carbon economy. Learn from international best practices: Norway's Sleipner project demonstrates safe geological storage; Canada's Boundary Dam shows retrofitting feasibility; UK's Net Zero Teesside cluster approach reduces infrastructure costs. India should also seek technology transfer via bilateral agreements (e.g., with US, Japan) under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.

What can be asked in exam?

  • •Prelims angle: India's net-zero emissions target year is 2070, announced at COP26 in Glasgow.
  • •Prelims angle: Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology targets hard-to-abate sectors like steel and cement.
  • •Prelims angle: The proposed outlay for the Carbon Capture Technology Promotion Framework is Rs 20,000 crore.
  • •Mains angle: Examine the proposed Carbon Capture Technology Promotion Framework in the context of India's net-zero target. How can RS 20,000 crore be effectively utilized? (GS-III, 250 words)
  • •Mains angle: Discuss the economic feasibility and regulatory challenges of deploying CCUS technology in India. Compare with international best practices. (GS-III, 250 words)

Test yourself · no signup needed

Attempt OPSC previous-year questions free

Try 3 real OPSC PYQs, see the answer instantly, then unlock the full set free.

OPSC PYQ 1 (2022) — Science

Genetic engineering, a revolutionary branch of biotechnology, continues to evolve rapidly, transforming the way we approach medicine, agriculture and various scientific endeavours. Recent developments in this field highlight both the immense potential and ethical considerations that come with the power to manipulate DNA. In the medical realm, gene editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have gained prominence. These tools offer unprecedented precision in modifying genes, holding promise for treating genetic disorders. In a groundbreaking clinical trial, researchers successfully used gene editing to treat sickle cell anaemia. The patient’s own modified cells were reintroduced into their body, resulting in reduced symptoms and an improved quality of life. In agriculture, genetic engineering is driving advancements in crop production and food security. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops has enabled plants to resist pests, withstand harsh climates and improve nutritional content. For instance, GM rice has been biofortified to contain higher levels of essential vitamins, potentially combating malnutrition in regions where rice is a staple food. However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns. The potential for creating “designer babies” through gene editing has sparked debates about the boundaries of genetic manipulation. The question of whether it’s ethical to alter human DNA to enhance physical or cognitive traits continues to challenge bioethicists, policymakers and society at large. Data indicates the exponential growth of genetic engineering research. In the past decade, the number of scientific publications related to CRISPR technology has multiplied significantly. In 2010, there were approximately 150 CRISPR-related publications; by 2020, that number had soared to over 9,000. This surge demonstrates the profound impact of genetic engineering on the scientific community. As we navigate this brave new world of genetic engineering, striking a balance between innovation and ethical considerations remains paramount. The potential to cure genetic diseases, enhance food security and make leaps in scientific understanding is immense. However, careful consideration and collaboration are necessary to ensure that the benefits are realized while addressing the ethical complexities that accompany these technological breakthroughs.

Which gene editing technology has gained prominence recently?

  1. It is used for creating GM crops
  2. It is a tool for gene editing
  3. It enhances physical traits
  4. It is used in biofortification

Answer: A. It is used for creating GM crops

OPSC PYQ 2 (2022) — English Comprehension

EMBEZZLE

In the following question, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word: EMBEZZLE

  1. Misappropriate
  2. Balance
  3. Remunerate
  4. Clear

Answer: A. Misappropriate

OPSC PYQ 3 (2023) — Reasoning

How many pairs of letters are there in the word 'CASTRAPHONE' which have as many letters between them in the word as in the alphabet?

  1. 3
  2. 4
  3. 5
  4. 6

Answer: D. 6

Free sample · Question 1 of 3

Science · 2022

Direction / Passage

Genetic engineering, a revolutionary branch of biotechnology, continues to evolve rapidly, transforming the way we approach medicine, agriculture and various scientific endeavours. Recent developments in this field highlight both the immense potential and ethical considerations that come with the power to manipulate DNA. In the medical realm, gene editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have gained prominence. These tools offer unprecedented precision in modifying genes, holding promise for treating genetic disorders. In a groundbreaking clinical trial, researchers successfully used gene editing to treat sickle cell anaemia. The patient’s own modified cells were reintroduced into their body, resulting in reduced symptoms and an improved quality of life. In agriculture, genetic engineering is driving advancements in crop production and food security. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops has enabled plants to resist pests, withstand harsh climates and improve nutritional content. For instance, GM rice has been biofortified to contain higher levels of essential vitamins, potentially combating malnutrition in regions where rice is a staple food. However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns. The potential for creating “designer babies” through gene editing has sparked debates about the boundaries of genetic manipulation. The question of whether it’s ethical to alter human DNA to enhance physical or cognitive traits continues to challenge bioethicists, policymakers and society at large. Data indicates the exponential growth of genetic engineering research. In the past decade, the number of scientific publications related to CRISPR technology has multiplied significantly. In 2010, there were approximately 150 CRISPR-related publications; by 2020, that number had soared to over 9,000. This surge demonstrates the profound impact of genetic engineering on the scientific community. As we navigate this brave new world of genetic engineering, striking a balance between innovation and ethical considerations remains paramount. The potential to cure genetic diseases, enhance food security and make leaps in scientific understanding is immense. However, careful consideration and collaboration are necessary to ensure that the benefits are realized while addressing the ethical complexities that accompany these technological breakthroughs.

Which gene editing technology has gained prominence recently?

Continue with exam actions

Explore more in EnvironmentOpen 17 Jun digestAttempt OPSC PYQ — free, no signupAttempt MPPSC PYQ — free, no signup

This week's CA quiz · 20 questions

Cross-topic questions from recent current affairs

Start →

More on Environment

Maharashtra Approves ₹45-Crore AI Bird Monitoring Centre at Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary

28 Jul

Assam Floods 2026: Death Toll Rises to 66 as Brahmaputra Displaces Lakhs

27 Jul

ARI Pune Discovers Five New Western Ghats Lichen Species Using DNA Analysis

23 Jul

Catch the Rain 2026: Jal Sanchay Jan Bhagidari Drives Community Water Conservation

22 Jul

Study notes on Environment

OPSC · Biodiversity — hotspots, conservation, endemic species

Free notes

UPPSC · Biodiversity — hotspots, conservation, endemic species

Free notes

MPPSC · MP — national parks (Kanha, Bandhavgarh, Panna, Satpura)

Free notes

TNPSC · Biodiversity hotspots — Western Ghats, Eastern Ghats endemic species

Free notes