pscprep.ai
BlogPricingAbout

Explore category

All State PCS Exams

Exam hubs, syllabus, strategy — and public PYQ attempt + insight pages.

National exam

UPSC CSE

PYQs, mocks, AI planner — Prelims Paper I & II.

State PCS

UPSCAvailableUPSC Civil Services (CSE)BPSCAvailableBihar (BPSC - CCE)CGPSCAvailableChhattisgarh (CGPSC - SSE)MPPSCAvailableMadhya Pradesh (MPPSC - SSE)MPSCAvailableMaharashtra (MPSC - Rajyaseva)OPSCAvailableOdisha (OPSC - OCS)RPSCAvailableRajasthan (RPSC - RAS)TNPSCAvailableTamil Nadu (TNPSC - Group 1)UPPSCAvailableUttar Pradesh (UPPSC - PCS)WBCSAvailableWest Bengal (WBCS)HPSCComing soonHaryana (HPSC)JKPSCComing soonJammu and Kashmir (JKPSC)JPSCComing soonJharkhand (JPSC)KPSCComing soonKarnataka (KPSC)PPSCComing soonPunjab (PPSC)UKPSCComing soonUttarakhand (UKPSC)
Current AffairsToolsFor InstitutesDashboard
UPSCState PCSCurrent AffairsToolsPricingBlogAboutInstitutes
pscprep.ai

Smart exam prep for UPSC and State PCS aspirants with adaptive planning, daily current affairs, and exam-focused practice.

Get the weekly digest

Top current affairs + exam tips, every Monday morning.

Explore

BlogUPSCState PCS ExamsExam ScheduleAttempt PYQPYQ trendsCurrent AffairsToolsPricingAboutContactLog inFor Institutes

Connect With Us

hello@pscprep.aiFollow on FacebookFollow on Instagram

Get the App

Google PlayApp Store — coming soon

Copyright © 2026 PSCPrep.ai. All rights reserved.

Legal business name: EXAMBEES

Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsCancellation/Refund Policy
Current AffairsInternal Security

India is now free from Maoism, says Amit Shah at Bastar

Monday, 18 May 20267 min read1,306 words27

Get the weekly digest

Top current affairs + exam tips, every Monday morning.

📝 AI-generated analysis for exam preparation. This is original educational content curated for competitive exam aspirants.

Internal SecurityDeep Analysisinternal securitygovernance reformsfederalismsocial justice

In this article

ContextBackground & Historical EvolutionKey Points & FactsMulti-Dimensional AnalysisWay Forward

Context

Union Home Minister Amit Shah declared India 'Naxal-free' during a visit to Bastar, Chhattisgarh on May 18, 2026. Speaking at the 'Ujar Bastar' programme under the 'Changing Bastar Ki Nayi Pehchan' initiative, Shah credited security forces for achieving the goal. He urged the local population to accept approximately 3,000 surrendered Naxals and integrate them into mainstream society. The Home Minister also announced the conversion of 70 out of 196 security camps in erstwhile Maoist-affected areas of Chhattisgarh into public service centres, named after freedom fighter Veer Gundadhur. Shah stated that India is now largely free from internal security challenges of Jammu & Kashmir, the Northeast, and Maoism—problems that were prevalent when the Modi government came to power in 2014. The event saw attendance from security forces personnel and families of those killed in Naxal violence.

Background & Historical Evolution

Left-wing extremism (LWE) in India originated with the Naxalbari uprising in West Bengal in 1967 and spread across several states forming the 'Red Corridor'. Over five decades, the insurgency has caused thousands of casualties and impeded development in tribal-dominated areas. The government adopted a multi-pronged strategy combining security measures with development initiatives. Key committees such as the P. K. Sharma Committee (2006) and the V. S. R. Committee (2007) provided recommendations on tackling LWE. In 2015, the government launched the 'SAMADHAN' doctrine (Smart Strategy, Action, Mainstreaming, Development, Harmony, Assessment, and Neutralization) to address the issue comprehensively. The Security Related Expenditure (SRE) scheme provided financial support to affected states. Additionally, the Aspirational Districts Programme aimed to accelerate development in LWE-affected districts. In Chhattisgarh, a major LWE hotspot for decades, intense operations by security forces led to the elimination of key Maoist leaders. The article notes that from 1971 to 2026, the region suffered a nightmare. The conversion of security camps into public service centres marks a shift from a security-dominated approach to developmental initiatives, indicating a potential closure of active conflict.

Key Points & Facts

  • Declaration: Union Home Minister Amit Shah declared India "Naxal-free" on May 18, 2026, during a programme in Bastar, Chhattisgarh.
  • Surrender: Approximately 3,000 Naxals have surrendered in Chhattisgarh, and the government has a comprehensive plan for their rehabilitation into mainstream society.
  • Security Camps: 70 of the 196 security camps in former Maoist-affected areas of Chhattisgarh will be converted into public service centres named after freedom fighter Veer Gundadhur.
  • Development Roadmap: Shah stated that loss suffered by Bastar in past decades will be recovered in the next three to five years, with all development work available in Raipur to be brought to villages within a year.
  • Security Forces: Shah credited the bravery of security forces for achieving a Naxal-free India, noting that from 1971 to 2026, the public suffered like a nightmare and many jawans sacrificed their lives.
  • Internal Security: Shah remarked that India is now largely free from security challenges of Jammu & Kashmir, the Northeast, and Maoism, which were major issues in 2014.
  • Rehabilitation: Shah urged the people of Bastar to accept surrendered Naxals and help them get a respectable place in society, with the government leaving no stone unturned.
  • The government's approach includes the Surrender-cum-Rehabilitation Policy (revised in 2018) under the Ministry of Home Affairs, providing financial incentives and vocational training for surrendered Naxals.

Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Political & Constitutional Dimensions: The government claims a historic achievement in counter-insurgency and highlights the success of its unified strategy. Home Minister Shah’s declaration serves to bolster the government’s image on internal security ahead of future elections. The constitution mandates the Union to protect states against internal disturbance (Article 355). The use of central armed police forces (CAPF) in coordination with state police underscores cooperative federalism. However, critics may argue that the declaration could be premature, as Maoist violence still persists in some pockets like Dantewada and Sukma districts of Chhattisgarh and areas of Jharkhand. Opposition parties might question the accuracy of the "Naxal-free" claim and demand verification through independent assessments. The issue also touches upon the erosion of civil liberties during the conflict due to extended powers of security forces under laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Economic & Financial Impact: The conversion of security camps into public service centres signals a shift in expenditure from security operations to development works. The initial funding for these centres will likely come from existing budgets for LWE areas, including Special Central Assistance (SCA) and Security Related Expenditure (SRE) scheme. In the long term, this transition can reduce security costs and boost the local economy by enhancing infrastructure and connectivity. However, critics point that sustained development requires substantial investment, and previous funds have been underutilized due to bureaucratic hurdles and corruption. The detailed roadmap for Bastar's development over the next 3-5 years will require clear fund allocation and monitoring.

Social Dimensions: The rehabilitation of about 3,000 surrendered Naxals is a critical social challenge. The local tribal population must accept them, which requires trust-building and social cohesion. The government's promise of a respectable place in society includes land, livelihood, and protection from reprisals. On the positive side, the integration of former militants can bring peace and stability. However, there are concerns about pending cases against surrendered Naxals and ensuring justice for victims of violence. The focus on development in Bastar, such as providing city-like facilities to tribal villages, addresses historical neglect but must be implemented sensitively to preserve local culture and rights under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution.

Governance & Administrative Aspects: The conversion of 70 security camps into service centres (named after Veer Gundadhur) is an innovative model to transform security infrastructure into public amenities. This requires coordination among multiple departments: home, panchayati raj, and social welfare. The success hinges on effective local governance, including empowered panchayats and district administrations. The federal aspect involves centre-state collaboration, as Chhattisgarh is the nodal state for this initiative. Implementation challenges include ensuring last-mile connectivity and maintaining security in vulnerable spots. Experts suggest that sustainable peace requires addressing root causes like land alienation, forest rights, and poverty through legal frameworks such as the Forest Rights Act (FRA) and the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA).

International Perspective: While not directly addressed in the article, India's experience in countering LWE offers lessons for other countries facing Maoist or left-wing insurgencies, such as Nepal, Philippines, and Colombia. The shift from security-heavy to development-light approach aligns with global best practices in post-conflict reconstruction. However, international human rights organizations have criticized human rights violations during anti-Naxal operations. India's success could burnish its image as a capable internal security manager, but it must be accompanied by transparent handling of remaining issues.

Way Forward

Short-term: Expedite rehabilitation of surrendered Naxals with skill training, land allotment, and security. Convert the 70 security camps into fully functional public service centres within the 18-month timeline announced. Strengthen local intelligence and police presence in remaining sensitive pockets to prevent resurgence.

Medium-term: Implement all development promises in Bastar within 3-5 years, focusing on education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Ensure fast-track courts for pending Naxal-related cases to deliver justice and reduce legal uncertainty. Leverage technology and e-governance in service delivery to curb corruption and improve transparency. The recommendations of the K. M. Chandrasekhar Committee (2009) on LWE emphasized good governance and development – implement its suggestions for administrative reforms.

Long-term: Address structural grievances via effective implementation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) and land reform. Enhance local democratic governance by strengthening panchayati raj institutions in tribal areas. Promote sustainable livelihood through forest-based enterprises, tourism, and agro-processing. Sustained peace requires continuous monitoring and community participation. International experiences like the Philippines' peace process with the CPP-NPA or Colombia's FARC peace deal highlight the importance of political settlement. India may explore dialogue and confidence-building measures with remaining dissident groups.

What can be asked in exam?

  • •Prelims angle: Union Home Minister Amit Shah declared India 'Naxal-free' on May 18, 2026 in Bastar, Chhattisgarh.
  • •Prelims angle: Approximately 3,000 Naxals have surrendered in Chhattisgarh according to the Home Minister.
  • •Prelims angle: 70 of the 196 security camps in erstwhile Maoist-affected areas of Chhattisgarh will be transformed into public service centres named after freedom fighter Veer Gundadhur.
  • •Mains angle: Examine the multi-dimensional approach adopted by the Government to combat Left-Wing Extemism (LWE) in India. Can we say that LWE is now successfully contained? (GS-III, Internal Security, 250 words)
  • •Mains angle: Discuss the challenges in rehabilitating surrendered Left-wing extremists and integrating them into mainstream society. Suggest measures for effective implementation of the Surrender and Rehabilitation policy. (GS-II, Governance & Social Justice, 250 words)

Test yourself · no signup needed

Attempt OPSC previous-year questions free

Try 3 real OPSC PYQs, see the answer instantly, then unlock the full set free.

OPSC PYQ 1 (2022) — Science

Genetic engineering, a revolutionary branch of biotechnology, continues to evolve rapidly, transforming the way we approach medicine, agriculture and various scientific endeavours. Recent developments in this field highlight both the immense potential and ethical considerations that come with the power to manipulate DNA. In the medical realm, gene editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have gained prominence. These tools offer unprecedented precision in modifying genes, holding promise for treating genetic disorders. In a groundbreaking clinical trial, researchers successfully used gene editing to treat sickle cell anaemia. The patient’s own modified cells were reintroduced into their body, resulting in reduced symptoms and an improved quality of life. In agriculture, genetic engineering is driving advancements in crop production and food security. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops has enabled plants to resist pests, withstand harsh climates and improve nutritional content. For instance, GM rice has been biofortified to contain higher levels of essential vitamins, potentially combating malnutrition in regions where rice is a staple food. However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns. The potential for creating “designer babies” through gene editing has sparked debates about the boundaries of genetic manipulation. The question of whether it’s ethical to alter human DNA to enhance physical or cognitive traits continues to challenge bioethicists, policymakers and society at large. Data indicates the exponential growth of genetic engineering research. In the past decade, the number of scientific publications related to CRISPR technology has multiplied significantly. In 2010, there were approximately 150 CRISPR-related publications; by 2020, that number had soared to over 9,000. This surge demonstrates the profound impact of genetic engineering on the scientific community. As we navigate this brave new world of genetic engineering, striking a balance between innovation and ethical considerations remains paramount. The potential to cure genetic diseases, enhance food security and make leaps in scientific understanding is immense. However, careful consideration and collaboration are necessary to ensure that the benefits are realized while addressing the ethical complexities that accompany these technological breakthroughs.

Which gene editing technology has gained prominence recently?

  1. It is used for creating GM crops
  2. It is a tool for gene editing
  3. It enhances physical traits
  4. It is used in biofortification

Answer: A. It is used for creating GM crops

OPSC PYQ 2 (2022) — English Comprehension

EMBEZZLE

In the following question, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word: EMBEZZLE

  1. Misappropriate
  2. Balance
  3. Remunerate
  4. Clear

Answer: A. Misappropriate

OPSC PYQ 3 (2023) — Reasoning

How many pairs of letters are there in the word 'CASTRAPHONE' which have as many letters between them in the word as in the alphabet?

  1. 3
  2. 4
  3. 5
  4. 6

Answer: D. 6

Free sample · Question 1 of 3

Science · 2022

Direction / Passage

Genetic engineering, a revolutionary branch of biotechnology, continues to evolve rapidly, transforming the way we approach medicine, agriculture and various scientific endeavours. Recent developments in this field highlight both the immense potential and ethical considerations that come with the power to manipulate DNA. In the medical realm, gene editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have gained prominence. These tools offer unprecedented precision in modifying genes, holding promise for treating genetic disorders. In a groundbreaking clinical trial, researchers successfully used gene editing to treat sickle cell anaemia. The patient’s own modified cells were reintroduced into their body, resulting in reduced symptoms and an improved quality of life. In agriculture, genetic engineering is driving advancements in crop production and food security. The development of Genetically Modified (GM) crops has enabled plants to resist pests, withstand harsh climates and improve nutritional content. For instance, GM rice has been biofortified to contain higher levels of essential vitamins, potentially combating malnutrition in regions where rice is a staple food. However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns. The potential for creating “designer babies” through gene editing has sparked debates about the boundaries of genetic manipulation. The question of whether it’s ethical to alter human DNA to enhance physical or cognitive traits continues to challenge bioethicists, policymakers and society at large. Data indicates the exponential growth of genetic engineering research. In the past decade, the number of scientific publications related to CRISPR technology has multiplied significantly. In 2010, there were approximately 150 CRISPR-related publications; by 2020, that number had soared to over 9,000. This surge demonstrates the profound impact of genetic engineering on the scientific community. As we navigate this brave new world of genetic engineering, striking a balance between innovation and ethical considerations remains paramount. The potential to cure genetic diseases, enhance food security and make leaps in scientific understanding is immense. However, careful consideration and collaboration are necessary to ensure that the benefits are realized while addressing the ethical complexities that accompany these technological breakthroughs.

Which gene editing technology has gained prominence recently?

Continue with exam actions

Explore more in Internal SecurityOpen 18 May digestAttempt OPSC PYQ — free, no signupAttempt MPPSC PYQ — free, no signup

This week's CA quiz · 20 questions

Cross-topic questions from recent current affairs

Start →

More on Internal Security

Kargil Vijay Diwas 2026: Nation Marks 27th Anniversary of Operation Vijay at Dras

27 Jul

DoT Mandates Telecom Data Localisation, Bars Infra Providers from Sharing Data Abroad

26 Jul

Positive Indigenisation Lists: Defence Self-Reliance Ahead of Kargil Vijay Diwas 2026

25 Jul

Government Bars Communication Infrastructure Providers From Sharing Telecom Data Outside India

24 Jul